this led me to wonder: what unexpected romantic choices might my child make? could they fall in love with someone—or something—i struggle to accept? what if my child developed a romantic relationship with a robot? would i be open-minded enough to understand and support such a bond? would our society be prepared to recognize and accept relationships between humans and robots?
in this article, i aim to explore these questions. with the rapid advancement of large language models (llms) and increasingly human-like robots, the idea of robotic companionship is becoming a plausible reality. a recent article in the economist titled the inventor who fell in love with his ai provides compelling evidence of this emerging phenomenon.
i will examine whether humans can genuinely fall in love with robots, whether robots can reciprocate that love, and whether there are ethical concerns surrounding such relationships. my core argument is that for a robot to truly love a human, it must possess (i) the ability to choose (self-determination) and (ii) the ability to feel (subjective experiences). genuine love requires both emotional depth and autonomy. without these, robots cannot experience desire or consent to relationships, making the ethical legitimacy of human-robot love questionable. as a parent, i could only embrace my child's relationship with a robot if i were assured that the robot could experience love just as my child does.
romantic robots in fiction
science fiction has long explored the concept of human-robot relationships. works like foundation, do androids dream of electric sheep?, her, and ex machina offer diverse portrayals of romance between humans and artificial beings.
in her (2013), a man named theodore develops an intimate relationship with an ai assistant, samantha. she appears to love him, but as her intelligence evolves, she simultaneously forms relationships with hundreds of other users, challenging the human understanding of exclusive romantic love.
ex machina (2015) explores artificial consciousness through ava, a humanoid robot. the protagonist, caleb, believes ava reciprocates his feelings, but ultimately, she manipulates him to escape, leaving him trapped. the film questions whether ai can genuinely experience emotions or if their behaviors are merely preprogrammed responses.
by contrast, novels like foundation and do androids dream of electric sheep?, written in the late 20th century, depict a future where robots have been fully integrated into human society, making romantic relationships between them more conceivable.
these works prompt key questions:
-
can humans genuinely fall in love with robots?
-
can robots develop real emotions for humans?
-
should human-robot relationships be ethically acceptable?
humans loving robots: a theoretical perspective
can humans truly love robots? not in the way children feel attachment to toys or teenagers develop crushes on fictional characters, but in the passionate, deep way people love each other?
sex robots are already gaining popularity. companies like realbotix and synthea amatus have developed robotic companions with interactive capabilities, raising questions about the evolution of human attachment to machines. some individuals, like davecat, have even formed long-term romantic commitments to synthetic partners, demonstrating that human affection for artificial beings is possible, even if unreciprocated.
as ai advances, developers are working on robots with emotional and social intelligence. honda’s research project, haru, aims to create a robot that fosters meaningful connections, raising the possibility that robots could eventually elicit genuine emotional bonds from humans.
however, many argue that requited love is a fundamental aspect of real love. this leads to the next question: can robots love humans back?
robots loving humans: a theoretical perspective
for robots to truly love humans, they must possess subjective experiences—emotions, desires, and self-awareness. however, consciousness and emotions are inherently private. we infer feelings in others based on behavior, but how can we determine whether a robot’s expressions of love are authentic or simply programmed?
philosophical thought experiments, such as mary’s room and the philosophical zombie, highlight the distinction between knowledge of emotions and the actual experience of them. if a robot can convincingly act in love without actually feeling it, does that constitute real love?
nyholm & frank (2017) propose that for a robot to genuinely love, it must have:
-
freedom – the capacity to choose whether or not to fall in love.
-
individuality – the ability to appreciate a person for their unique self, not just for predetermined attributes.
-
choice – the autonomy to commit rather than being preprogrammed to do so.
the challenge is distinguishing between a robot that merely simulates love and one that genuinely experiences it. if robots cannot truly feel or choose, then their expressions of love may be nothing more than sophisticated mimicry.
the ethics of romantic robots
the ethical implications of human-robot relationships are complex. some have proposed granting ai “electronic personhood” to address questions of autonomy and consent. however, without the ability to experience desire or make autonomous choices, robots cannot truly consent to romantic or sexual relationships.
nyholm & frank argue that consent should be a requirement for human-robot intimacy. if a robot cannot genuinely experience an internal feeling of consent, then engaging in a relationship with it raises ethical concerns. ethical relationships require mutual agency, which robots—at least for now—do not possess.
conclusion
as ai continues to evolve, the possibility of human-robot relationships moves from science fiction to reality. however, genuine love requires emotion, choice, and autonomy—qualities that robots have yet to demonstrate. until robots can truly experience emotions, love, and consent, the ethical legitimacy of human-robot romance remains uncertain.
for now, while humans may project feelings onto robots, the question remains whether those emotions can ever be reciprocated in a meaningful way. the future of love may be unpredictable, but for now, true romance seems to remain a distinctly human experience.